Experience & Observation (E&O) Pattern

IRI:
http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/experience
Version IRI:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modellingDH/odp_experience/master/owl/cp_experience.owl.ttl
Authors:
Alessio Antonini
Alessandro Adamou
Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa
Imported Ontologies:
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
Other visualisation:
Ontology source

Abstract

The E&O pattern focuses on the engagement in an activity, and on the creation of an observation as result of a prompting.


Ontology Graphic

Table of Content

  1. Classes
  2. Object Properties
  3. Annotation Properties
  4. General Axioms
  5. Namespace Declarations

Classes

Activityc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/icity/ActivitySpecification/Activity

is in domain of
includesop
is in range of
in activityop
is disjoint with
Engagementc, Observationc, Personc

Engagementc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/Engagement

This class is the core type of entities that represent a reification of one’s involvement in an activity. If, for example, the participant’s reason for their interaction was to write a review for a magazine, this will be encoded in instances of this class.

has sub-classes
Promptingc
is in domain of
in activityop
is in range of
engaged inop, has engagementop, is reflection onop
is disjoint with
Observationc, Activityc, Personc

Observationc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/Observation

A disjointness or alignment between this class and http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/observation.owl#Observation in the Observation content pattern is plausible but subject to debate, hence will not be formalised herein.

is in domain of
is reflection onop
is in range of
includesop, produced observationop
is disjoint with
Engagementc, Activityc, Personc

Personc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/persons.owl#Person

is in domain of
engaged inop
is disjoint with
Engagementc, Observationc, Activityc

Promptingc back to ToC or Class ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/Prompting

The stimulus within an activity that causes an observation.

is equivalent to
Activityc and (produced observationop some Observationc)
has super-classes
Engagementc

Object Properties

engaged inop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/isEngagedIn

has domain
Personc
has range
Engagementc

has engagementop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/hasEngagement

has range
Engagementc
is inverse of
in activityop

in activityop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/inActivity

Connects an activity with the many possible ways to engage in it.

has domain
Engagementc
has range
Activityc
is inverse of
has engagementop

includesop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/includes

A standard mereological property from another content pattern may be used in lieu of this one and therefore aligned with it.

has domain
Activityc
has range
Observationc

is reflected upon inop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/isReflectedUponIn

is inverse of
is reflection onop

is reflection onop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/isReflectionOn

has domain
Observationc
has range
Engagementc
is inverse of
is reflected upon inop

produced observationop back to ToC or Object Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/producedObservation

has range
Observationc
has sub-property chains
has engagementop o is reflected upon inop

Annotation Properties

covers requirementsap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#coversRequirements

This annotation property is used for exemplifying possible requirements the content pattern provides a solution for. Requirements are expressed as natural language competency questions.

creatorap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator

descriptionap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/terms/description

example of useap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/experience#exampleOfUse

extracted fromap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#extractedFrom

This annotation property should be assigned with a URI, which points to the possible reference ontology which the annotated pattern was extracted from (i.e. the reference ontology that the ontology elements have been deeply or partially cloned by). The range is not explicit in the definition of the annotation property because it would turn the ontology to OWL Full. E.g. The participation pattern is extracted from the Dolce Ultra Lite ontology, hence the value for this annotation property is http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl

has componentap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#hasComponent

This annotation property is useful for content ontology design patterns. Its value is a URI, which refers to another content ontology design pattern which is a component of the annotated one.

has consequencesap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#hasConsequences

This annotation property is used for briefly describing the benefits and/or possible trade-offs when using the CP.

has intentap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#hasIntent

This annotation property is used in order to describe the intent of the content pattern.

has unit testap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#hasUnitTest

This property can be used to annotate a unit test (e.g. in the form of a SPARQL query) to be launched to evaluate an ontology against a requirement-based task.

is clone ofap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#isCloneOf

This annotation property is used for referring a cloned ontology entity to its cloning source.

is specialization ofap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#isSpecializationOf

This annotation property is useful for content ontology design patterns and its elements. Its value is a URI, which refers either to a content ontology design pattern that is specialized by the annotated one, or to an ontology element that is specialized by the annotated one.

reengineered fromap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#reengineeredFrom

This annotation property should be assigned with a URI, which points to the concept schema, page, or anything else from which the annotated pattern was reengineered. If the source does not have any URI e.g., a printed book, this property value should provide information as precise as possible in order to identify the source. This property is alternative to the extractedFrom property because it is used when the pattern come from a concept schema which is not an owl ontology. For example content ontology design patterns, which are reengineered from data model patterns, rdf schemas, etc. should be annotatd with this property. E.g. The basicpersonalfoaf pattern is extracted from the rdf FOAF specification, hence the value for this annotation property is http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20071002.rdf

related c psap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#relatedCPs

This annotation property can be used to indicate other CPs (if any) that specialize, generalize, inlcude, or are components of the CP. Furthermore, this field may indicate other CPs that are typically used in conjunction with the described one. Important similarities and differences with other patterns can be also described here.

scenariosap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#scenarios

This annotation property is used for describing examples of instantiation of the Content OP. For example, for the part-of Content OP (which represents part-whole relations) a possible scenario is the sentence: "the brain is part of the human body". Scenarios are expressed as natural language sentences.

titleap back to ToC or Annotation Property ToC

IRI: http://purl.org/dc/terms/title

General Axioms

All Disjoint Classes back to ToC

Engagementc, Observationc, Activityc, Personc

Namespace Declarations back to ToC

default namespace
http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/experience#
activityspecification
http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/icity/ActivitySpecification/
cpannotationschema
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl#
experience
http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/experience#
icity
http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/icity/
master
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eureadit/reading-experience-ontology/master/
odp
http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/
orcid-org
https://orcid.org/
owl
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
persons-owl
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/persons.owl#
rdf
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfs
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
schemas
http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/
term
http://modellingdh.github.io/ont/odp/term/
terms
http://purl.org/dc/terms/
xsd
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

This HTML document was obtained by processing the OWL ontology source code through LODE, Live OWL Documentation Environment, developed by Silvio Peroni.